View RSS Feed

Penguin

Religion's conspicuous absence in this election campaign

Rate this Entry
by , 04-29-2011 at 06:03 PM (431 Views)
With a Canadian federal election just a few days away, I thought I would do a blog post about the role religion has played in the platforms of the parties and the campaigns so far. However, when I went looking for the religion on the campaign trail, I discovered that it was barely to be found.

All the party leaders have had the obligatory photo-ops at various religious events, but these - such as Ignatieff and Layton's appearances at the Sikh Khalsa Day parade in Toronto - seemed to be more about reaching out to different cultures than they were about being seen as aligned with religious faith. The underlying theology was unimportant.

And as for the party platforms themselves, religion and faith barely get a mention. The only reference I could find was in the Conservative platform, which proposes to create a new Office of Religious Freedom within Foreign Affairs. While I'm still not entirely sure that this isn't a euphemism for some sort of evangelism-supporting or US-style "faith-based initiatives" program, at an estimated cost of $5 million per year, it's barely a blip in a federal budget of billions of dollars.

So what should we take from this? In the view of some, it's an indication that religion is a personal, private matter for Canadians; one recent opinion piece suggested that the Canadian political landscape has settled out with the Conservatives holding the religious vote and not needing to court it further, and the other parties not courting it because they know they can't get it.

However, I think there's a more straightforward reason for the lack of religious rhetoric in the campaign: religion is becoming increasingly irrelevant for Canadians. While most Canadians do consider themselves affiliated with some sort of religion, only 21% attend weekly religious services, and this number is dropping sharply year-over-year. A recent study predicted the impending "extinction" of religion in Canada and 8 other countries.

I think that in this country - and in sharp contrast to our neighbour to the south - religious affiliation has lost the social benefit it once did, so politicians, like Canadians in general, no longer experience the same sort of pressure to believe... or more importantly, to be seen believing.

Hopefully this means that they'll place more importance on being seen to govern.

Updated 04-29-2011 at 06:25 PM by Penguin

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags
Categories
Atheism , ‎ Religion

Comments

  1. Blondin's Avatar
    I sure hope you're right, Penguin. I can't help worrying that Harper & Co do have a religious agenda they hope to implement by stealth. Like proclaiming the abortion issue is off the table - but systematically withdrawing funding for anything remotely associated with pro-choice or womens issues.
  2. Penguin's Avatar
    I have some of those worries, too, but I think it's telling that they try to be as quiet as possible with issues like de-funding pro-choice organizations: they realize that on the whole, the electorate won't see it as a righteous act; when the voters find out, it'll hurt them more than it helps them.

    If the Conservatives have a religious agenda, it'd have to be implemented by stealth because the Canadian voting public would never stand for an overt religious agenda.
  3. Kiefer's Avatar
    Well, the results were certainly disappointing. I did not expect a majority... I voted NDP, but I live in Harper's riding so it was a throw away vote anyways.
  4. JersonInsurens's Avatar
    well that's a good point. Skepticism and passivity are the destructive results from centuries of subjugation to religion and tradition